© Planetlemans – Marcel ten Caat
Three weeks after the 2010 Le Mans 24 Hours, and after inspecting the cars that contested this year’s event, Peugeot Sport looks back at the problems that affected the 908 HDi FAPs in the French race and provides details of its plans for its Intercontinental Le Mans Cup programme during the second half of the season.
Looking back to the 2010 Le Mans 24 Hours
Bruno Famin (Technical Director, Peugeot Sport): “To begin with, with regard to the N°3 908 HDi FAP which retired 2½ hours into the race, we have found a quality-related problem concerning the production of the tub at the point where the lower front-right suspension wishbone is attached to the chassis. This is the same tub that won the 2009 Le Mans 24 Hours and the 2010 1,000km de Spa-Francorchamps, and – like every 908 chassis – is regularly inspected at the factory using sophisticated tools that enable us to detect ageing or damage to the carbon. The problem in this case, however, was due to a totally undetectable defect which resulted in a premature and sudden failure of the mounting point.
“As far as the engines are concerned, it didn’t take us long to confirm that all three engines suffered the same problem, i.e. conrod failure, although the cylinders that were affected were different. Further investigation has just revealed that the particularly severe conditions encountered at Le Mans in June led to excessive overload of the V12s in question.
“Indeed, the track benefited from high levels of grip this year, so the engines spent longer at full throttle than we expected. At the same time, the weather stayed cool and, unlike previous years, the air/air intercoolers did not become clogged up. The filling of the combustion chambers remained extremely efficient throughout, which in turn meant that the performance delivered by the engines was particularly high. Okay, the conditions were the same for all competitors, but we were running new conrods this year. That said, they had undergone thorough testing on the bench and during the numerous on-track simulations we carried out upstream of the race.
“We didn’t observe the slightest problem with them during any of these test sessions, so there was nothing to suggest that we were closer to the limit than we had imagined. As it turned out, the race conditions tipped us to the wrong side of that limit. Having contested the Le Mans 24 Hours three times, we had every faith in our processes. The evidence now points to the fact that this wasn’t the case and that despite our growing experience, it is very difficult to master absolutely everything. The conditions we face at Le Mans differ every year, as do the constraints to which the cars are subjected. It is clear that we need to reinforce our validation procedures.”
The second half of the season: the 2010 Intercontinental Le Mans Cup
Peugeot Sport’s programme for the second part of the season will focus on the team’s participation in the Intercontinental Le Mans Cup. Either one or two cars will take part in the three races that make up this series and Peugeot Sport’s Director Olivier Quesnel has divided up the ‘drives’ amongst Team Peugeot Total’s nine drivers as equally as possible:
1,000km of Silverstone (September 10-12): one 908 HDi FAP
In addition to the 908 HDi FAP entered by Team Oreca-Matmut, a factory Peugeot will contest the race with:
Anthony DAVIDSON (GBR) / Nicolas MINASSIAN (FRA).
Petit Le Mans, Road Atlanta (September 29-October 2): two 908 HDi FAPs
Anthony DAVIDSON (GBR) / Marc GENE (ESP) / Alex WURZ (AUT)
Pedro LAMY (POR) / Franck MONTAGNY (FRA) / Stéphane SARRAZIN (FRA)
Zhuhai 1,000km (November 5-7): two 908 HDi FAPs
Franck MONTAGNY (FRA) / Stéphane SARRAZIN (FRA)
Sébastien BOURDAIS (FRA) / Simon PAGENAUD (FRA)
Looking ahead to 2011
Last but not least, during a lunchtime team debrief after the Le Mans 24 Hours, Olivier Quesnel, explained how pleased he was with the professionalism of Team Peugeot Total’s nine drivers, both during the long build-up to the 2010 Le Mans 24 Hours, as well as during the race itself. His will is to renew his confidence in the same line-up for the 2011 endurance racing season.
great article, was waiting for Peugeot’s reaction for some time
Professionalism of the drivers during the race…something is missing here. They won’t admit one of the bunch goofed up a bit. They need to check Davidson’s media etiquette.
Peugeot is understandably very high on him for his speed. But he should be in for a “warm” reception from corvette fans at Petit.
Take Loic Duval instead of Davidson! That guy was INSANE with the Oreca 908.
Media etiquette? What was wrong with it? REFRESHING springs to mind and a change to the usual manufactured crap is always welcome especially in this sport IMO – F1 it ain’t. Still, if Pug WERE to let him go it would be THEIR loss and make no mistake, AD will relish the visit to Road Atlanta probably more than the P&M fans themselves!
Refreshing…there’s a different take. Well it take garner a lot of drama, and emotion. if that’s the angle you’re watching. But for a sport where lives hang in the balance you still have to express a bit of concern publicly.
But as far as Peugeot’s loss they got rid of him, do you know how long the line is behind him?
I’m sure he will relish his visit to Road Atlanta too. However he better be dotting his i’s and crossing his t’s. Considering that Corvette is one of the pillar teams of the ALMS (they have the most fans), and Johnny O’Connell is from Georgia, the slightest mistake will get him called in for a stop and HOLD penalty.
didnt one of the peugeots have a ferrari off the track at one point to? think they own the place. end of the day audi pushed them and they broke. one thing leading but another chasing as they were on sunday!
Bourdais should have been one of the pilotes for petit, since he has the most fans here out of all of the peugeot pilots. Panoz being based in Georgia, the whole connection with Champ car…that should have been a crystal clear cut decision.
I think you’ll find as a whole Pug pushed THEMSELVES too hard when they need not to have done in the end. Although, after being ordered to push by Quesnel to make up time post the electrical problem AD was, I admit, to blame for the Ferrari incident but not Collard’s IMO. On the Bourdais front, I agree – v odd decision.